Loading Runway...
Loading Runway...
Evidence-backed analysis of how AI automation affects Cybersecurity Analysts. Scores derived from published research — McKinsey, BLS, Stack Overflow, and industry data.
Automation Risk
Defensive Strength
Estimated Runway
6+ YearsMarket Context
Cybersecurity is unique in that AI simultaneously creates demand (AI-powered attack surfaces, deepfake phishing, LLM jailbreaking) and provides defensive tooling (SIEM AI, CrowdStrike AI, Darktrace). ISC2's 2025 Cybersecurity Workforce Study reported a global talent gap of 4.8 million security professionals, the largest ever recorded. Routine alert triage is being automated, but threat hunting, red teaming, incident response coordination, and security architecture require adversarial creative thinking that AI cannot replicate. NIS2 (EU), DORA financial regulation, and expanding US SEC cybersecurity disclosure rules are driving compliance-driven hiring through at least 2027.
Source: Based on ISC2 Cybersecurity Workforce Study 2025, CrowdStrike Global Threat Report 2025, Bureau of Labor Statistics OOH for Information Security Analysts (updated Sep 2025, projecting 33% growth through 2033), and (ISC)2 Salary Survey 2025.
Task Breakdown — Time Allocation vs. Vulnerability
Highest Exposure Areas
Hands-On Technical Execution
41% of code written in 2025 is AI-generated. The defensible technical work is system architecture, novel problem-solving, and integration of AI tools — not execution of known patterns. Standard technical execution is being absorbed at an accelerating rate.
Analysis / Reporting
Standard analysis and reporting is already being absorbed by AI at the enterprise level. McKinsey notes analysis tasks among the sharpest automation increases. The defensible remainder is interpretation requiring proprietary context — that window is closing.
Data Entry / Admin Processing
Agentic AI systems already handle invoice processing, data entry, and scheduling at scale. This task category is the most advanced in automation deployment — enterprise rollouts are accelerating quarter over quarter.
Strongest Defenses
Hands-On Technical Execution
41% of code written in 2025 is AI-generated. The defensible technical work is system architecture, novel problem-solving, and integration of AI tools — not execution of known patterns. Standard technical execution is being absorbed at an accelerating rate.
Compliance / Risk / Regulated Judgement
Regulatory requirements create a genuine structural moat — human sign-off requirements under EU AI Act, financial regulations, and professional liability standards. The near-future pressure: AI handles the interpretation and analysis; the human role narrows to final sign-off and accountability.
Decision-Making Under Uncertainty
This remains one of the most defensible task categories — AI struggles with genuine novelty and accountability. The erosion condition: as AI decision-support tools become standard, the bar for what counts as 'genuine uncertainty' rises, and roles that mostly execute defined playbooks lose this protection.
Live signals
Real-time AI signals affecting this role
Compare roles
See how other roles compare
This is the average. What about you?
The average Cybersecurity Analyst scores 30/100 risk. But your specific role, environment, and task allocation could be higher or lower. Get your personalised score in ~4 minutes.